News, , , ,

Religious Bigotry Didn't Start with Ilhan Omar

Religious Bigotry Didn't Start with Ilhan Omar



Visit us at:

Website: https://www.oann.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OneAmericaNewsNetwork

Twitter: https://twitter.com/OANN

Author Since: Sep 20, 2018

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQEcEYtWYB0 1:36 to 7:06 but very important you go to 4:07 to 7:01 that states these information that exposes the evilness of evil islam: The next time you see a hijab, remember it is not a fashion statement. It is a statement about islam, political islam, and how we (Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, and other non-muslims) are to be dominated. Bill Warner, PhD: The Political Side of Hijabs (CORRECTTION: THE EVIL POLITICAL SIDE OF EVIL HIJABS OF EVIL ISLAM. Most people see the hijab as religious or cultural, but the hijab is a symbol of the Sharia and has a very political meaning. Fox News must make a PUBLIC APOLOGY FOR REBUKING JEANINE PIRRO FOR JUST TELLING THE TRUTH (WHICH IS FOX NEWS IS SUPPOSED TO DO) AND AIR THE APOLOGY EVERY HOUR BEFORE AND AFTER THE BEGINNING OF EACH FOX NEWS SHOWS AND NEWS REPORTS. AND PUT IT ON NEWSPAPERS AND AS PART OF THEIR PUBLIC APOLOGY TO JEANINE PIRRO, FOX NEWS MUST PAY A HEAVY FINE BY DOUBLING JEANINE PIRROR'S SALARY AS PART OF THEIR PENALTY OF ILLEGALLY PRACTICING THAT EVIL COMMUNISTIC POLITICAL CORRECTNESS ACT THAT THEY JUST DID AGAINST JEANINE PIRROR!

  2. The wearing of the Hijab is in direct violation of the 6th Amendment of the U.S Constitution that mandatorily states that the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND IS THE CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTION and the wearing of te Hijab is a direct and indirect and subtle defiance of our CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS for the wearing of the Hijab is an act of IMPOSING THE BANNED SHARIA LAW THROUGH STEALTH JIHAD (JIHAD MEANS VIOLENCE) using Taquiyya (license to lie) and Tawriya (license to project a false impression) to catch us off our guard just the way they did against FORMERLY CHRISTIAN LEBANON.

    This EVIL SOMALIAN ISLAMIST TERRORISTIC SUBTLE WOMAN is using stealth jihad and using all kinds of EVIL creeping sharia tactic-strategy to impose the BANNED SHARIA LAW WHICH IS BANNED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR IT IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SOVEREIGN LEGAL JURISDICTIONAL RIGHT OF THE 6TH AMENDMENT OF THE CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTION and imposing an indirect form of Sharia through stealth jihad means they have created a kind of state within a state in a very subtle way so that no one will notice BUT MANY WELL INFORMED CHRISTIANS AND STAUNCH U.S CONSTITUTIONALISTS HAS NOTICED THAT VIOLATION OF THE SOVEREIGN LEGAL JURISDICTION OF THE 6TH AMENDMENT OF THE CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTION!

    And any indirect and subtle act of creating a state within a state is an act of secession and therefore an act of sedition which violates the SOVEREIGNTY OF THE LEGAL JURISDICTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTION AS STATED OUT IN THE 6TH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S CONSTITUTION. These U.S Congress men and women are so dumbed-down, brainwashed, indoctrinated with evil liberalism's evil ideologies such as self-suicidal liberal political correctness and cover up to protect their failed liberal narratives which has been exposed by Gad Saad as the "OSTRICH MENTAL SYNDROME" of denial of reality of the evilness of evil islam-evil muslims that they have become blind to the grave AND DANGEROUS EVIL domino evil effect this will have throughout the United State's sovereignty as a SOVEREIGN CHRISTIAN STATE AS STATED OUT IN THE CHRISTIAN-BASED U.S CONSTITUTION WHEN IT WAS CREATED BY THE CHRISTIAN FOUNDING FATHERS AND AS STATED OUT AGAIN IN THE 6TH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S CONSTITUTION ITSELF!

    We were warned by Usama Dakdok about this dangers of evil creeping stealth Sharia for he said that there are kinds of 2 islam, islam when muslims are weak and islam when muslim are strong. As long as muslim are a minority and islam when muslim are a majority. And majority on islam is not 51% it is 4 or 5 percent. This is what exactly what happened to Christian Western Lebanon. When they are weak and small and a minority they practice Stealth islam in order to pretend they are good, decent, etc in order to lower down our guard. But when they are strong, large, and a majority AND HAS INFILTRATED THE U.S GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, SECURITY AGENCIES, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, MILITARY AGENCIES, POLICE AGENCIES, NATIONAL GUARD AGENCIES, THE ARMED SERVICES OF ALL AGENCIES THEN THEY PRACTICE THE 2sd ISLAM WHICH IS EVIL VIOLENT ISLAM WHICH IS THE EVIL TRUE EVIL FORM OF ISLAM. This is what exactly what happened to Christian Western Lebanon.
    Now this evil woman is acting as if they are the evil majority evil muslim even though they are not because they are enabled by evil liberal politicians-judges-lawyers, evil leftist politicians-judges-lawyers, evil activist politicians-judges-lawyers! Especial by evil activists self-suicidal political correctness brainwashed/brain-dead judges in the 9th circuit courts throughout America that they have infested!
    Muslim Congresswoman Ilhan Omar makes history by wearing hijab THE EVIL ISLAMIC HIJAB AND BURQA IS EXPOSED AS AN EVIL POLITICAL EVIL SYMBOL. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQEcEYtWYB0 1:36 to 7:06 but very important you go to 4:07 to 7:01 that states these information that exposes the evilness of evil islam: The next time you see a hijab, remember it is not a fashion statement. It is a statement about islam, political islam, and how we (Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, and other non-muslims) are to be dominated. Bill Warner, PhD: The Political Side of Hijabs (CORRECTTION: THE EVIL POLITICAL SIDE OF EVIL HIJABS OF EVIL ISLAM. Most people see the hijab as religious or cultural, but the hijab is a symbol of the Sharia and has a very political meaning.

  3. But….. ILHAN!!!!! WANTS! sharia…. In OUR/HOME! AMERICA! ASK/ Ilhan… IF/She! Is LOYAL… To… sharia! Or…. OUR US. CONSTITUTION!!!!!! : The ANSWER/IS: sharia/It's in… THEIR!!! QURAN!!! (KORAN!)…..YUP!

  4. No, Judge said that Sharia is antithetical to the Constitution. Read the Quoran , Google Sharia law. Judge is right! Liz, you seemed pretty smart until now, seeing as how you are unable to distinguish such nuance in her Opening statement.

  5. I never thought I would question Liz but headwear in Congress was not allowed by rules. J Pirro was pointing out how Sharia law is against our constitution and Omar does want to destroy America.

  6. I disagree with you Liz . Sharia law is Not compatible with the Constitution. People who adhere to this should NOT be allowed in our Government PERIOD.

  7. Bottom line is the fact that you can not trust muslims that practice the Islamic religion.  They only know one thing and that is if you don't practice their religion you must be put to death.  They have been trying to take over the whole world for thousands of years and they have to intentions to stop now.

  8. Liz Wheeler's attempt at evenhandedness is inherently flawed. The Constitution can only be upheld by someone committed to the Judeo Christians worldview, it cannot be upheld by someone with any other worldview, be it Islamic, or atheist…it simply wasn't written for them. Those worldviews are fundamentally at odds with the Constitution & its principles, and those who hold them will naturally come into conflict with it, and one must prevail over the other. This can already be empirically observed, it's why the Left & the SJW's (committed to atheism as they are) are constantly trampling over people's Constitutionally protected, God given rights. If you still haven't realized that the current battle in the US is a worldview fight, specifically between Christianity vs every other worldview, then you're not even in the fight yet.

  9. The Constitution allows for all religious, if any religion is not tolerant of others and in fact states violence or even death if their doctrine is not followed cannot be accepted in this country ! Its that simple !

  10. Total BS, Samuel Adams once spoke of the conflict between Roman catholics, and a democratic society. Catholics were not allowed to run for office. And in some places. Not allowed to vote. In time. Elections changed this. Free speech? Yes. Freedom to vote? Yes. I agree with Pirro. And will vote accordingly.

  11. I believe was Judge was asking was a valid point, in The US our Constitution was inspired by the Judeo-Christian ideas but our laws do not follow religious laws or punishments. In ANY Islamic republic, {see, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia (kingdom) you see the laws written and carried out according to their religious theology. There is NO separation between civil and religious matters. If you don't understand, google Talak ( or read the UAE news, fun!}. This is the point Judge Pirro was trying to make. The question of any elected official , or judge forming a decision, because they may belong to the Christian faith and may supposedly be SWAYED by that faith and presumably deny a person their Constitutional rights is an entirely different question. the Full psychoses Democrat Asshats want to lump them altogether, They think the US will buy it. and sadly, most are. It is no coincidence that it says the Sword of Truth in the Bible. Armour of God !

  12. Oh I love listening to Judge Jeannie…she's brilliant. When Omar was allowed to swear on the Koran and be allowed to wear a hijab in Congress it was against the American constitution…both sides of the congress allowed this…Omar was given such power by this decision.

  13. Bigotry??? Let's talk about fidelity. If someone has 'dual loyalty' to two countries why would you think that they have loyalty to either? and certainly not to both! How about if you are married, and your husband has 'dual loyalty' to two women????

  14. Islam is different Liz because it is both a religion AND a way of life: this premise is fully accepted in our society. Try and tell someone you are living your life according to your CHRISTIAN beliefs and see how far you get with that. "Practicing Islam" shoud be a disqualification for public service in our Judeo-christian form of government. The two cannot co-exist, period.

  15. I don't find it "wrong" to question one's faith (especially Islam) if it involves targeting others.
    The great Judge Jeanine Pirro said nothing "wrong" when criticizing Omar's faith.
    This world has fallen apart due to the multitude of religions that bring immoral values to society.
    Omar wants to rise up with her religion, as that's EXACTLY what the Islamic communities want to achieve, one world religion, Islam.
    Now so you want the children of the future to live under that? A religion that oppresses women and children?
    If Fox cancels Judge Jeanine Pirro show, I hope OAN takes her. This will be Fox's greatest loss.
    The three advertisers who stated they won't advertise on her program are losers anyway:
    Letgo
    Novo Nordisk
    Nerdwallet
    I say good riddance.
    Likewise to the advertisers who are offended by Tucker Carlson's old remarks. Let them go. We the people don't need them anyway, the advertisers that is.

  16. sharia law IS contrary to the constitution which will never come first to muslims, just ask one. Video surfaced of Omar declaring victory over the US government. And I disagree with changing OUR rules so she can wear that in the first place.

  17. Some religions aren't compatible with our constitution. e.g. Religions that believe in human sacrifice…Or religions that encourage the murder of non-believers/gays and disobedient children.

  18. To distinguish your channel, can we quickly get past the focus on 'personality cult' & spare us the video replay.?? No one wants to hear the insult . Again ! Just the voice alone agitates and annoys. It's harsh to see a young announcer almost contort their face and raise their voice to meet the decibel in this non-issue . Stick to what she said is true and deserves expanding. –Israel and its lobby do not care if its political allies, including
    those in the Christian right and the Trump White House, possess warped
    and racist attitudes about Jews. The Christian right and many of those
    in the White House, while embracing Zionism, are also anti-Semitic.
    President Donald Trump has called neo-Nazis “very fine people” and once tweeted an illustration of Hillary Clinton
    against a background of hundred-dollar bills and with the Star of David
    superimposed near her face. The sole criterion of Israel and the Israel
    lobby in determining who to support and who to demonize is identifying
    who backs the far-right agenda of the apartheid state of Israel and who
    does not. Genuine anti-Semitism is irrelevant.—Chris Hedges
    https://www.truthdig.com/articles/israels-stranglehold-on-american-politics/
    —Don't become a clone of Fox pleeeeze…..

  19. Mormons in Tucson blacklist anyone who refuses to put up with Mormon Mission harassments. Call the police when they keep knocking on your door then next thing you know you have people stalking you and harassing you at every turn. If you live in apartment complexes expect to keep getting your lease terminated with false allegations to the courts who are in bed with the Mormons. More mormons in Arizona than Utah. Never live in Mormon country ….they are like Muslim terrorist.